Category: Retention

Gift as Responsibility: White Privilege

This post is about white privilege, on a blog devoted to renewal of college mathematics.  What are the connections?  Can we save college mathematics without understanding the role of white privilege in higher education?  Do you accept the existence of ‘privilege’?

I think about white privilege, and the role it played in my own journey, on a regular basis.  The motivation to make this post comes from conversations we are having in my department about addressing the equity gap — the differential outcomes for specific ‘ethnic’ groups, specifically black students.  This past week, a colleague suggested that she could begin to build better relationships by requiring every student in the class to speak with her outside of class.  Like me, this instructor is white.

Students with a privileged condition will have a reasonable choice about doing something like talking with the instructor outside of class.  Students with low privilege, no privilege, or negative privilege will face some challenges in complying with this directive from a white instructor.  You might be thinking that all students would try to avoid talking with a math instructor privately, and there is some truth in the statement.  However, those of us who have benefited from white privilege often fail to understand the range of forces involved in low- and high-privilege situations.

If you are white in America, you may in fact wonder if privilege exists … perhaps people with status and power have worked harder and were smarter.  Here is a one question ‘test’ to see if you have privilege relative to ethnicity and race:

Do you have the choice to control how much your identity is based on ethnicity and/or race?

Some people I know are white, and some of them will say that they don’t see themselves as white; that is a clear statement of white privilege.  I’ve yet to hear a black person say that they don’t see themselves as black; sure, some “black folks” identify very strongly as black, and others less so.  The point is … in America, being black means that you don’t control your basic identity.

Okay, so accept (perhaps for the sake of argument) that white privilege exists.  Does it have anything to do with higher education, in mathematics specifically?

To answer that question, just think about the most common observations about ‘struggling’ students:

  • Passive
  • Not prepared
  • Lack of academic facility

How do students arrive in our classes ready to be active, to be prepared, and to have academic facility?  They had a combination of ‘family’ and K-12 education that provided a basis for functioning in a mathematics classroom.  A student with white privilege is more likely to have had parents with the time and inclination to actively support learning … and support risk taking.  A student with white privilege is more likely to have attended a K-12 system with opportunities for higher levels of learning, as well as better preparation for college.

White privilege is a gift that I received at birth, paid for by predecessors choices; much of my white privilege is the direct and indirect result of inhuman treatment … racism … and wealth accumulation.  I am not responsible for the gift, but I am responsible for being able to use that gift.  I can go through life pushing to higher levels of power and wealth, or I can use the gift as little as possible.  I can’t avoid using the gift — when I stand in front of a class, speak to my administrators, or even post on this blog, the gift of white privilege is there giving me an advantage.  Every time I use this gift of white privilege, somebody else is prevented from building a privileged condition for themselves.

I can’t speak for other  ‘white folk’, just like a black colleague not being able to speak for ‘black folk’.

However, I intend to continue using this gift of privilege as little as possible.  I seek to lift up those who did not get this same gift, even when it means some loss to me.  I don’t claim to be very good at that; in fact, I would judge that I have missed far too many opportunities to increase the privileged condition for those around me … and those in my classrooms specifically.

In my classrooms, I do not need to do much to get higher status.  Therefore, I can spend more of my energy — especially in the first week of class — on creating an inclusive classroom.  An inclusive classroom is “privilege proof”, meaning that the benefits (learning) have no connection to the level of privilege for any student.  Throughout the semester, I need to continue to include and build up all students; students who lack privilege previously should get more of my support.

If that last part bothers you (about differential support), just think about this:  Students with the most ‘white privilege’ do not need us for much of anything.  They will be successful learning mathematics without us, or even in spite of us.  An unskilled or uncaring instructor will harm low privilege students, but will have almost no impact on students like me — because of the white privilege.

White privilege is especially important in school settings.  In higher education, we once had a system which only served those with privilege … almost universally white males in this country.  In my view, if you are not thinking about white privilege, you can only be an effective educator if all your students are ‘just like you’ (in terms of race/ethnicity).

White privilege provides a systemic advantage to a specific group of people.  If you are a member of this group, I think the gift of white privilege imposes upon you a responsibility to consciously minimize the use of the gift of privilege.  The use of privilege will reinforce the lack of privilege for another group — every time privilege is used.

 

Corequisiste Remediation as a STEM Recruiting Tool

Seems like much of the world (in higher education) has gone ‘crazy’ with reforms intended to remove mathematics as a barrier.  Are we happy with that vision of mathematics?  Are we content with a system which minimizes the learning of mathematics in college?

Perhaps we have not seen some potential opening doors which could support the vision for mathematics we would advocate.  Corequisite remediation has been implemented as a disruptive influence on an algebraic-based mathematics requirement … if a student does not qualify for “college algebra”, put them in a non-algebraic course (statistics, liberal arts math, QR, etc) with a support course which will cover a minimum of mathematics (just enough to learn that stat/Lib Arts/QR course).

Take a step back, and think about these questions.

  • Do these non-algebraic courses typically have high needs for ‘remediation’? Or, did we have artificially high prerequisites for these courses … so now corequisite remediation allows us to save face while not providing any significant advantage to students?
  • Do the initial STEM-enabling courses (such as college algebra and pre-calculus) have high needs for remediation and support?

To the extent that the answers are “no” and “yes” (respectively), the reform process has been mis-directed.

In addition, we have students who have the potential to be STEM majors — but are intimidated by the prospects of passing the STEM-enabling math course (college algebra, pre-calculus, calculus I).  The current reform work deliberately pushes these students into programs outside of STEM.

Let’s re-direct the reform work to meet student needs and enable many more students to achieve their STEM dream.  Instead of attaching co-requisite support classes to non-algebraic math, attach them intentionally to STEM-enabling math courses.  Whether a student barely places directly in to such a course, or minimally passes a prior math course, their prospects are not good currently.   Think about students within 1 standard deviation above the cutoff on a placement assessment, and those with 2.0, 2.5, C, and C+ grades.  Maybe something like this:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where do we want students to succeed?  If we are okay with students succeeding if they avoid STEM-enabling mathematics courses, then continue doing the current reforms.  On the other hand, if you want students to choose STEM and succeed, it might be time to consider a better use for co-requisite support classes.

 Join Dev Math Revival on Facebook:

Student Success & Retention: Key Ideas

I’m working on a project which involves a search for strong research articles and summaries, and that included some work on ‘retention in STEM’.  I have some references on that, later; however, I wanted to present some key ideas about how to keep students in class so they succeed and how to retain them across semesters.

Rather than look at certain teaching methods as ‘the answer’, let’s look at some key ideas with surface validity and examine their implications for teaching.

  • Students need to be working with the content over an extended period in order to be successful.

We know that learning is the result of effort, usually intentional.  Attendance is easily measured, but is not sufficient by itself.  The class needs to establish environments where students want to work with the material, and we know that grades are insufficient motivation for many students.

  • Non-trivial ‘success’ (positive feedback) based on effort is strong motivation for most people.

If success seems impossible regardless of effort, it is easy to see why students would stop working.  However, success regardless of effort is also likely to result in drastic reductions in effort.  As in most human endeavors, people need to see a connection between effort and reward.

  • A teacher’s attitudes are more important than specific methods.

A few years ago, I was trying some very different things in a class; in fact, I was not very proficient with some key parts of that plan.  However, my students responding to my attitude more than those methods.  As one student said, “Mr. Rotman would not give up on me!”  An honest belief that almost all students are able to succeed is strong motivation.

We need to see our classes as a human system, a community with a shared purpose.  Most people need relationships with a purpose … connections that help them deal with challenges.  I am not trying to be a friend to my students, but we do form a community which can support all members.

  • Every student contributes to the success of the class.

Not all students will pass a math class.  Some of those who do not pass are able to provide help to those who do pass.  This past semester, I had a student who did very poorly on written assessments who routinely helped the class understand concepts and procedures.  The contributions of a student are valued independently of their grade, and independently of any other measure or category (ethnicity, social standing, mastery of formal language, etc).

I have not mentioned any teaching methods; pedagogy does matter … but the pedagogy follows from other ideas.  I can not use the key ideas above if all I do is ‘lecture’ (though I do a fair amount of that).  My class must provide a variety of interactions in order for my attitudes to be clear … and for all students to have opportunities to contribute.  Establishing a community is social navigation, so students need times to talk with each other in smaller groups as well as the entire class.

Here are some good articles and summaries of retention in mathematics and other STEM fields; these studies focus on retention in programs as opposed to courses … though there are obvious connections between the two.

  1. Teaching For Retention In Science, Engineering, and Math Disciplines: A Guide For Faculty http://www.crlt.umich.edu/op25
  2. Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM  http://www.fgcu.edu/STEM/files/Increasing_Persistence_of_College_Students_in_STEM.pdf
  3. Retaining Students in Science,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Majors
    http://mazur.harvard.edu/sentFiles/Mazur_399966.pdf
  4. Should We Still be Talking About Leaving? A Comparative Examination of Social Inequality in Undergraduate Patterns of Switching Majors http://wcer-web.ad.education.wisc.edu/docs/working-papers/Working_Paper_No_2014_05.pdf
  5. Gender and Belonging in Undergraduate Computer Science: A Comparative Case Study of Student Experiences in Gateway Courses http://wcer-web.ad.education.wisc.edu/docs/working-papers/Working_Paper_No_2016_02.pdf

Success and retention starts with us, and depends upon both our attitudes and our professional knowledge.

 Join Dev Math Revival on Facebook:

WordPress Themes